ASTM STANDARDS COMPARISON

ASTM D695 vs ASTM D1621: Rigid Plastic vs Rigid Foam Compression

Compare ASTM D695 compression testing for rigid plastics with ASTM D1621 compression testing for rigid cellular plastics such as foams. Both standards apply compressive loading, but they evaluate different material structures and deformation behavior. D695 focuses on solid rigid plastics and can determine compressive strength, yield behavior, and modulus. D1621 addresses cellular materials that crush, collapse, or densify under load. Choose the standard that matches whether the specimen is a solid plastic or a rigid foam with cellular architecture accurately.

Accredited Lab Network Fast Turnaround Strict NDA Standard

1. What Compression Testing Measures

Compression testing measures how a material responds when a force pushes it together. The test shows how much compressive stress the material can carry and how its thickness or length changes under load. Results can include compressive strength, compressive stress at a specified strain, yield behavior, modulus, and deformation characteristics that support material selection, design, and quality control.

ASTM D695 applies to rigid plastics. It evaluates solid polymer specimens that resist compression through the bulk material. Engineers use it to characterize compressive properties of molded, machined, or fabricated rigid plastics. ASTM D1621 applies to rigid cellular plastics. Cellular plastics deform through mechanisms such as cell-wall bending, buckling, crushing, collapse, and densification, so their stress-strain response differs substantially from that of a solid plastic.

The standards answer related but different questions. D695 focuses on how a solid rigid plastic carries compressive load, while D1621 characterizes the compressive response of a material whose cellular structure controls deformation. Specimen dimensions, loading rate, conditioning, density, cell structure, and loading direction can affect results. Use D695 when the product is a solid rigid plastic and D1621 when rigid foam or cellular construction defines performance. Follow the governing specification when it sets preparation or test conditions.

2. Full Comparison

Material structure matters more than density alone. A solid plastic and a cellular foam can use the same polymer chemistry but require different compression standards.

PARAMETERASTM D695ASTM D1621
Material structureSolid rigid plasticRigid cellular plastic or foam
Typical specimenStandard rigid plastic compression specimenFoam block or cellular specimen
Deformation behaviorElastic compression, yielding, crushing, or fractureCell wall bending, buckling, collapse, and densification
Primary outputsCompressive strength, yield stress, modulus as applicableCompressive stress at specified deformation, maximum strength, effective modulus
Design contextRigid plastic parts and material dataFoam cores, insulation, cushioning, structural cellular products
ISO relationshipEquivalent to ISO 604Technically equivalent to ISO 844

3. Materials Covered

D695 targets solid rigid plastic materials. D1621 targets rigid cellular structures where pores or cells dominate the compression response.

Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics

  • Rigid thermoplastics and thermosets
  • Reinforced rigid plastic materials within scope
  • Machined or molded solid plastic specimens

Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics

  • Expanded polystyrene and rigid polyurethane foams
  • Rigid cellular plastic insulation
  • Structural foam and sandwich-core cellular materials

4. How Each Test Is Run

Both methods compress a specimen between platens, but they track different deformation behavior and use material-specific specimen requirements.

Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics

  • Prepare the required solid plastic specimen with flat, parallel loading surfaces.
  • Center the specimen between compression platens and apply load at the specified rate.
  • Record force and deformation to calculate compressive properties.

Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics

  • Prepare a representative rigid cellular specimen and measure its dimensions and orientation.
  • Center the foam specimen between platens and compress it under the specified conditions.
  • Use the load-deformation curve to calculate the required compressive stress, strength, or effective modulus.

5. Testing Equipment

EQUIPMENTASTM D695ASTM D1621
Universal testing machineRequiredRequired
Compression platensRigid, parallel platensRigid, parallel platens sized for cellular specimen
Deformation measurementCrosshead or suitable strain measurementCrosshead or deformation measurement suited to foam compression
Specimen preparationMachining or molding for solid plasticCutting tool that avoids crushing or damaging cells

6. Applications

Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics

  • Rigid plastic resin qualification
  • Compression behavior of molded plastic components
  • Engineering data for solid thermoplastics and thermosets

Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Cellular Plastics

  • Insulation foam qualification
  • Structural foam and sandwich-core evaluation
  • QC for expanded plastics and rigid cellular products

7. Strengths and Limitations

STANDARDSTRENGTHLIMITATION
ASTM D695Provides standardized compressive properties for solid rigid plastics and supports engineering material comparison.It does not represent the collapse and densification behavior that controls rigid cellular materials.
ASTM D1621Captures the characteristic compression response of cellular materials and supports foam QC and material selection.Foam properties can vary strongly with density, cell structure, orientation, specimen size, and loading history.

8. Which Standard Should You Run?

IF THIS DESCRIBES YOURUN THISWHY
Your sample is a solid rigid plastic or reinforced plasticASTM D695D695 directly covers compressive properties of rigid plastics.
Your sample is an expanded or rigid cellular plasticASTM D1621D1621 addresses the cell collapse and deformation behavior of rigid cellular materials.
Your product combines a solid skin with a cellular coreDefine the property you need before selecting the methodA skin-core product may require specimen preparation or additional test methods to isolate the relevant structure.

Still unsure? Infinita Lab can review your material, specimen form, governing specification, and reporting goal before you submit samples for ASTM D695 or ASTM D1621 testing. Talk to our team.

9. Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use ASTM D695 for foam?

Use D1621 for rigid cellular plastics. D695 targets solid rigid plastics and does not describe foam-specific deformation behavior.

What does ASTM D1621 report for foam?

The method can derive compressive stress at selected loads or deformations, compressive strength at maximum load, and effective modulus from the load-deformation response.

Does foam orientation matter?

Yes. Cell orientation and manufacturing direction can change compressive response, so the report should identify specimen orientation when relevant.

Are D695 and D1621 values directly comparable?

No. The material structures and deformation mechanisms differ. Compare results within the same method and material class.

Standard / PageDescription
ASTM D695: Rigid Plastic Compressive Strength Testing Guide
ASTM D695: Rigid Plastic Compressive Strength Testing Guide
THE SUPERLAB ADVANTAGE

Talk to a Scientist, Not a Coordinator

✓ 2,000+ Accredited Labs ✓ 20,000+ Test Types ✓ Strict NDA Standard
Home / / ASTM D695 vs ASTM D1621: Rigid Plastic vs Rigid Foam Compression Testing
×

Talk to an Expert

    Connect Instantly

    (888) 878-3090
    Ensure Quality with the Widest Network of Accredited Labs
    • ddd
      Quick Turnaround and Hasslefree process
    • ddd
      Confidentiality Guarantee
    • ddd
      Free, No-obligation Consultation
    • ddd
      100% Customer Satisfaction

      ddd

      Start Material Testing